Levi Strauss & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
*694OPINION AND JUDGMENT
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge.
In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice Marshall stated that “[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is”, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803) (emphasis added), a position generally accepted by the bar and the judiciary for the past one hundred ninety-eight years. This proposition was significantly limited, if not partially overruled, by the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), which was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.