Legal Opinion

Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 11, 1998No. 95 Civ. 0134(SAS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

The parties have moved in limine pursuant to Rule 16(c)(3) and (4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”) to preclude the admission of certain evidence. Thirty separate motions were fully submitted on October 26, 1998. Eight of those motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Dolinger for a report and recommendation. The parties also addressed the question of whether the liability and damages issues should be tried separately. Oral argument was held on November 2 through 5, 1998. The following constitutes the Court’s rulings…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colon Ex Rel. Molina v. Bic USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. U.S. Information Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 3District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Ciena Corp. v. Corvis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  5. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API