Legal Opinion

Widmark v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 6, 1998No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Daikon Shield Claimant Lenore Widmark’s (“Ms. Widmark”) Motion To Vacate Arbitration Decision. The Daikon Shield Claimants Trust (the “Trust”) opposes Ms. Widmark’s motion. On October 15,1997, the Court took evidence and heard argument on the motion and the matter was taken under advisement. For the reasons which follow, the Court will DENY Ms. Widmark’s motion.

I

Ms. Widmark is a Daikon Shield claimant' who alleges that she suffered injuries as a result of her use of the Daikon Shield IUD. Proceeding under Option 3 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  2. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Gaither (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Fields (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  2. Maksimuk v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  3. Schwalm v. Dalkon Shield TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  4. Widmark v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API