Legal Opinion

Father & Sons & A Daughter Too v. Transportation Services Authority

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2008No. 47156; No. 47349PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*256OPINION

2Per curiam

NRS Chapter 706 defines fully regulated common motor carriers as including persons who hold themselves out to the public as willing to be employed to transport household goods by vehicle within Nevada. Nevada law further defines the “transportation of household goods” as including the movement of such household goods by use of a rented vehicle that is driven by someone associated with an entity that has a commercial or financial interest in providing services related to the movement of those goods.

Based on these statutory definitions, we conclude that a company that is financially…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gandy v. State Ex Rel. Division of Investigation & NarcoticsNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cook Tractor Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nevada Public Employees' Retirement Board v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. City of Las Vegas v. EvansNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. FATHERS & SONS v. Transp. Servs. Auth.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Harrah's v. State, Dep't of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Nev. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd. v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API