Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Hazel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 1963No. 18076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

In this action to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for twenty-two dollars and fifty cents. From an order refusing to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.

The accident occurred in the City of Greenville, on the morning of March 10, 1959. Both vehicles were proceeding along Anderson Street in the vicinity where said street approaches and intersects Pendleton Street, the plaintiff’s vehicle being in front of the defendant’s vehicle. Except for the fact that the front of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Jumper v. GoodwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Fuller Ex Rel. Estate of Fuller v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. Van WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ravan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Massingille v. MeridithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  4. Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API