Legal Opinion

Massingille v. Meridith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 4, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Chief Justice.

This is an automobile accident case in which the only question on appeal is whether the trial court was wrong in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Meridith, was in the process of entering the northbound portion of the North-South Expressway in Louisville by way of a ramp leading upward from Critten-den Drive when his car was struck from the rear by an automobile driven by the defendant, Massingille. The ramp in question enters rather abruptly and at an acute angle onto the main traveled portion of the expressway, there being no merging or “feeder”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hainline v. HukillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  2. Daniel v. HazelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Whitford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Nichols v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Brascia v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API