Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 1944No. 15633PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Oxner

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court':

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola, which he claims contained bluestone. The first trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,000.00. Defendant appealed and the judgment was reversed on account of error in the exclusion of certain testimony offered by the defendant. 193 S. C., 51, 7 S. E. (2d), 641, 127 A. L. R., 1185. The case was tried again and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $300.00.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. State v. . SimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Gantt v. Columbia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. WyseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  5. Fields v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API