Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Railroads. Negligence. Nonsuit. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. September term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff was a night watchman in the yard of the railroad company. This yard included a platform (used for transferring freight), 150 or 200 yards in length, and about 8 feet wide. The duty of the watchman comprehended overlooking the platform as well as the rest of the yard. It also, embraced, according to his evidence, attention to the switches and care, in seeing that nothing happened by reason of the switches being wrong, and that no obstruction occurred to trains in passing over or through the yard. At night, in the, darkness, he ran along the platform with a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Jackson v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Quirouet v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Chattanooga Iron & Coal Corp. v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API