Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Iron & Coal Corp. v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1924No. 3989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Hines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

As a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and as the defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, we will not consider the refusal of the judge to grant a nonsuit; but we will deal with the questions raised by the motion for a nonsuit in disposing of the grounds of the'motion for new trial.

In order for the plaintiffs to recover, it was necessary for them to show that they owned the iron ore in the lands in suit. Plaintiffs derived title to this ore through the will of H. S. Chamberlain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chidsey v. BrookesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Sapp v. ClineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Hall v. ArmorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Hanesley v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Thrift Bros. v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Turner v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. White v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Williamson v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API