Legal Opinion

United States v. Sturm

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1950No. 10017PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order of the District Court entered August 22, 1949, denying defendant’s motion to vacate three sentences imposed upon him by that court on June 11, 1947. Apparently his motion was based upon Section 2255, Title 28 United States Code Annotated, which is, in part, as follows: “Unless the motion and the files and recqrds of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API