Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Linthicum v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1911No. 21,690PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Vanderburgh Circuit Court; Curran A. DeBruler, Judge. Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of Edward Linthicum and others, against the Board of Commissioners of the County of Vanderburgh and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This was a mandamus proceeding by appellants, against the Board of Commissioners of the County of Vanderburgh and others. It involves the right of the county to vote aid to a bridge company, for the construction of a bridge over the Ohio river, under §4405 Burns 1908, Acts 1889 p. 266. So much of the section as applies here, reads as follows: “That counties wherein any bridge over any river or stream forming the boundary of the State of Indiana, or any part thereof, may be located, or any of the townships of such counties, are hereby authorized to take stock in or make donations to such…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. United States v. Oregon & California RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Teton County Youth Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In Re BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. DobrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API