Legal Opinion

In Re Burke

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1923No. Crim. No. 2534PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

—The petitioner asks for his discharge on habeas corpus from an imprisonment under a charge of a violation of the Wright Act, so called, being an act of the legislature submitted to a referendum at the last election and carried by the people. His principal point is that the act is void because it purports to enact into the law in this state all the penal provisions of the so-called Volstead Act, being an act of Congress passed pursuant to the eighteenth amendment of the federal constitution, and to enforce its provisions.

The question whether a state may enact a law in that manner is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. State v. TausickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ex Parte LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API