Jones Mercantile Co. v. Copeland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
Judges of the superior courts are vested with a sound discretion in the enforcement of rule 25 (Code, § 24-3324), providing that cases be " called and tried in the order in which they are docketed, without anji preference or delay, unless it shall appear to the court that it shall be injurious to press a cause to trial when regularly .called;” and that "a different order in calling the docket may be pursued by the court, in its discretion, for the purpose of giving facility and expedition to its proceedings, or for furthering the ends of justice.” Unless it be shown that the judge abused his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Fuller v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. MarkensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hightower v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Laseter v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Holland v. BoyettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Horchler v. Van ZandtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.