Grant v. Cananea Consolidated Copper Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 14, 1907, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside the service of a summons and granted such motion. The nature of the action, the facts, so far as material, and the question certified are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 14, 1907, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside the service of a summons and granted such motion. The nature of the action, the facts, so far as material, and the question certified are stated in the opinion. The statutes of this state expressly authorize a service of summons snch as was made on the defendant Gananea Company and it is not within the province of the courts of this state to change or modify the…
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
The Appellate Division, in allowing an appeal to this court, certified the following question: “ Upon the facts appearing upon this application, did the Supreme Court of this state acquire jurisdiction of the Cananea Consolidated Copper Company, 'Sociedad Anónima, in this action.”
It appears from the allegations of the complaint that James A. Grant, the plaintiff, is the owner of stock in the defendant Cobre Grande Copper Company, an Arizona corporation, of which the defendant William C. Greene is the president and the owner of the majority of the stock; that the plaintiff brings this action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pennsylvania Lumbermen's Mutual Fire Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pope v. Terre Haute Car & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- At. Pac. Tel. Co. v. . Balt. O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Harrell v. Peters Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Compania Mexicana Refinadora Island v. Compania Metropolitana De OleoductosNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Loeb v. Star & Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Sadler v. Boston & Bolivia Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.