Legal Opinion
Compania Mexicana Refinadora Island v. Compania Metropolitana De Oleoductos
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1928PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
Attempted service of the summons in this action upon the defendant corporations has been set aside. Both corporations are organized under the laws of Mexico. In that country they produce and transport oil. In this State the oil is sold. It is said that the corporations are present in this State and are transacting business here. The Appellate Division has made contrary finding.
We set forth briefly our conclusions, based on statements of fact contained in the voluminous affidavits submitted upon the motion. The defendant corporations have never had any office or bank account in this State. No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Grant v. Cananea Consolidated Copper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Ultramar Company, Limited v. . Minerals Separation, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by23 opinions
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Fremay, Inc. v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Hastings v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Librairie Hachette, S. A. v. Paris Book Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Pickthall v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.