Legal Opinion

Isaacs v. Davies

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Master and Servant Actions. Former Recovery. Before Judge Pate. Pulaski Superior Court. November Adjourned Term, 1880. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

It appears by the record in this case that Isaacs, the plaintiff in error, employed Davies, the defendant in error, to clerk for him for five months, at $35.00 a month, pay*170able at the end of each month. That soon after Davies commenced work he was detained three or four days therefrom by the sickness and death of a child, Isaacs, however, consenting to his absence. Upon his return, Isaacs refused to allow him to continue in his service, or further to perform his contract, but discharged him.

At the end of the first month Davies sued him and recovered judgment for $35.00,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blun & Sterne v. HolitzerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dalton v. American Ammonia Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. McMullan v. Dickinson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Smith v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Crawford v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Harvey v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API