Legal Opinion

State v. Snow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2004No. CC 99CR0872; CA A110840; SC S49504PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

While a police officer was in hot pursuit, defendant left his automobile behind and fled on foot. The question that this case presents is whether the officer could search defendant’s automobile without a warrant to determine defendant’s identity. The Court of Appeals held that the officer could do so, reasoning that the search fell within the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. State v. Snow, 179 Or App 222, 39 P3d 909 (2002). We affirm the Court of Appeals decision but on different grounds.

Just before noon on September 20, 1999, Deputy Sheriff Randy Lucas was driving on Highland…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MatsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API