Legal Opinion
Lopez v. Orlor, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1997No. Civil No. 3:95CV1890(PCD)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs renew their motion for class certification with respect to Counts I and III. Plaintiffs also move for summary judgment as to liability on Counts I and III. For the reasons below, both motions are granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs purchased a used car from defendant on March 23,1995. In conjunction with the credit purchase of this vehicle, defendant sold plaintiffs a balance protection plan (“BPP”) for $475. The BPP is designed to protect an insured consumer, if the car is stolen or totaled, from having to pay the outstanding balance on the car which may not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Elnora G. POPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jacqueline Turner, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Beneficial Corporation, Beneficial National Bank, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- In Re Playmobil Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Vallies v. Sky BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Weber v. GoodmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.