Legal Opinion

Black & Decker Inc. v. Positec USA Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 20, 2020No. 1:13-cv-03075Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BLACK & DECKER INC. and BLACK & ) DECKER (U.S.) INC., ) Case No. 13 CV 3075 ) Plaintiff, ) Judge Joan B. Gottschall v. ) ) POSITEC USA INC. and RW DIRECT, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Black & Decker Inc. and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (collectively “plaintiffs”) allege that defendants Positec USA Inc. and RW Direct Inc. and collectively “defendants”) infringe claim 16 of

U.S. Patent No. 5,544,417

(sometimes “417 patent”) by selling certain WORX®-branded products in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Roger W. Brown, ph.d. v. 3m, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Revlon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API