Legal Opinion

Wickline v. Gunter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1989No. 88-965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Petitioner-appellant, Lee Wickline, who is presently serving a prison sentence in Nebraska, filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum” in Lancaster County. Frank Gunter, described in the petition as the “Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services,” is the respondent-appellee. The district court found on the pleadings that Wickline was lawfully imprisoned, held that Wickline failed to allege sufficient facts to entitle him to the writ of habeas corpus, and dismissed the action. Wickline timely appealed to this court.

In this court, Wickline’s assignments of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. WarrenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. State v. WicklineNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Aaron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RiegerNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API