Legal Opinion

Matthies v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2012No. 2010-CT-00783-SCTPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLSON, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. We granted certiorari in this case to address the issue of whether, in a driving-under-the-influence trial, the admission of intoxilyzer calibration records, in lieu of the live testimony of the person who calibrated the intoxilyzer, is a violation of the Confrontation Clause contained in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Finding no constitutional violation, we affirm the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the Madison County Circuit Court.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THE TRIAL COURT

¶ 2. Dr. Andrew K. Matthies lived in Ocean…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Rigby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DyarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Drabicki v. City of RidgelandCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  3. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Dominick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  5. Lara v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API