Legal Opinion

Frew v. Barto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1942No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff, Dorothy Frew, brought this action in trespass for damages for injuries sustained in a collision of an automobile in which she was riding as a guest passenger and an automobile driven by the original defendant, R. E. Barto. He joined as additional defendants William Spittler, the driver of the car in which plaintiff was riding, Adam I. Heinbach, Spittler’s employer — a dealer who had the car for sale — and Warren Yeiser, its owner, alleging that the accident was the result of the sole or joint negligence of Spittler, as agent of Heinbach, and Yeiser, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Dugan v. McGara's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Marach v. KooistraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sexton v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Norton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Kunkel v. Vogt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Bogdanoff, to Use v. ManisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Lanteigne v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API