Legal Opinion

Hartsema v. Addison Coal & Coke Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 40,106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce from her husband John Hartsema, April 26, 1934, which contained a provision that he should assign to her a one-half interest in all rentals to be received by him from one Fisher, the lessee of certain premises, until all past due temporary alimony and attorney fees should be paid. In this decree the court expressly reserved “jurisdiction over the question of any further payments to be made by the de fendant to the plaintiff as permanent alimony or in lieu of a property settlement. ’ ’ Hartsema had leased the land from the Pere Marquette Railway Company…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Hill v. BowmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Baker v. Hellner Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Halkes v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. F. Inc. v. VicikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Long Development, Inc. v. Oak Park Village Ltd. Partnership (In Re Long Development, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API