Hoffman v. Dep't of Indus. Relations of Cal.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WASTE, C. J.—
The above cause was transferred to this court after decision by the District Court of Appeal, in order that further consideration might be given to the contention of the petitioner that the Industrial Accident Commission acted in excess of its jurisdiction in finding that the employer was guilty of “serious and wilful misconduct,’’ and in imposing the additional fifty per cent compensation permitted by the Workmen’s Compensation Act in such cases. Such further consideration convinces us that the award was proper and that the decision of the District Court of Appeal correctly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Parkhurst v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hatheway v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.