Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 25, 1988No. 09-87-115 CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appellant was indicted for burglary of a habitation, and he filed a motion to suppress evidence seized by police officers. The trial court overruled the motion to suppress after a pre-trial hearing. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement he pleaded nolo contendere to the indictment and was found guilty by the trial court. Appellant pleaded true to two enhancement allegations, and the trial court assessed punishment of twenty-five years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

On September 30, 1986, Detective Charles Myers of the Nederland Police Department…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Nicholas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
  2. Beverly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
  3. Beverly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
  4. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API