Legal Opinion
Martin v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided November 2, 1988No. 09-83-118 CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
DIES, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from Appellant’s conviction for the offense of possession of a controlled substance. A jury found Appellant guilty of possessing methamphetamine, and the trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years and six months detention in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $5,000. Upon original submission, this court reversed Appellant’s conviction and ordered a new trial because the record did not contain proper waivers of the right to trial by jury as to the punishment phase of the trial. Martin v. State, No. 09-83-118 CR…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Worthey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. Callie Mae Merritt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.