Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beverly v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 11, 1989No. 09-88-202-CRPublished

1DissentBrookshire, Justice

With respect, this dissent is filed.

The record on the Motion to Suppress clearly shows that the location in question was a high crime area. The area involved was known as the Virginia Village Apartments. There existed, at these apartments, a problem with trespassers and loiterers some of whom played a part in the drug scene. The problem was severe because it was enhanced and aggravated by so much trafficking with drugs that the management of the apartment simply had to do something to counteract the trafficking with illegal drugs. Hence, the management warned certain persons to stay off the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Frank Bodzin v. City of Dallas, Alonzo Burgin, Steven Padgett, and Skaggs Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API