Legal Opinion

Sugerman v. MCY Music World, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 14, 2001No. 00 CIV. 3365(RMB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BERMAN, District Judge.

1. Introduction

This is a dispute over the meaning of a letter agreement dated February 22, 1999 (“Agreement”). Plaintiff Andrew Suger-man (“Sugerman” or “Plaintiff’) claims that he is entitled to at least $13,315,000.00 in finder’s fees under the Agreement. (Plaintiffs Complaint, dated May 2, 2000, ¶ 57(A)) (“Complaint”). Defendants MCY Music World, Inc., MCY America, Inc., and MCY.com, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) assert that Plaintiff is not entitled to compensation under the Agreement because neither Sugerman nor his business associate Todd Sanders (“Todd”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bd. of Managers of Trump Tower at City Ctr. Condo. v. PalazzoloDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Gutkowski v. SteinbrennerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. United Resource Recovery Corp. v. Ramko Venture Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Cosgrove v. Columbia Care Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Gatto v. Fujitec America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API