Legal Opinion

Currie v. Koehler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1926No. Appeal 171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The plaintiff, F. J. Currie, filed a lien as sub-contractor against the property of George E. 'Koehler. The contract of the plaintiff was with a man by the name of Meissner and under said contract, the plaintiff was to furnish all the labor and material necessary to complete the plumbing work and install the hot water heating system in the house.

The fault which the appellants find with the lien is that it lumps the charge for labor and materials and does not sufficiently itemize the articles furnished, nor the labor which entered into the performance of the work and he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willson v. CanevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Ott v. DuPlan Silk Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Bennett Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. HartrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Barker Painting Co. v. General Carbonic Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson Service Co. v. Fayette Title & Trust BuildingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Meier v. Harney and DuffySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Giansante v. Pascuzzo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964
  4. Leeward Construction Inc. v. SCP 2007-C27-093 LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API