Legal Opinion

Meier v. Harney and Duffy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1930No. Appeal 33PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This case comes up on appeal by defendants from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff on a scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. The claimant was a subcontractor. A condition precedent to his right to file the lien was that he had given the owner of the building written notice of his intention to file it, verified by affidavit, setting forth the name of the party with whom he contracted, the amount alleged to be still due, the nature of the labor or materials furnished and the date when the last work was done or last materials were furnished. This is the requirement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willson v. CanevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. McVey v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Este v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Ott v. DuPlan Silk Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. A. G. Breitwieser Lumber Co. v. Wyss-ThalmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. MastroianniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Gray v. McKinleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Moss & Blakeley Plumbing Co. v. SchauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API