Legal Opinion

(PC) Ruth v. Bird

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00529Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EBER G. RUTH, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00529-ADA-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED 14 LANDON BIRD, et al., IN FORMA PAUPERIS 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 7) 16 17 Plaintiff Eber G. Ruth is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 19

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 11, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Kinnell v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Luedtke v. BertrandDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API