Legal Opinion
Kinnell v. Graves
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 14, 2001No. 00-3404PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Roily 0. Kinnell, a Kansas state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a civil rights complaint alleging that dismissals of previous federal court actions, in which he sought stays of state criminal proceedings and prison disciplinary proceedings, amounted to an unconstitutional denial of his access to the courts. 1 The district court noted that Kinnell had filed more than three previous actions which had been dismissed as frivolous, and therefore determined that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) barred him from pursuing an action in forma pauperis (ifp). Later, the district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Clark v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Childs v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Save Palisade Fruitlands v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.