Legal Opinion

United States v. Ines Herrera Martinez, United States of America v. Alfonso Cortez-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2004No. 03-1229, 03-1233PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found Ines Herrara Martinez and Alfonso Cortez-Gomez guilty of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, and further found Martinez guilty of illegal reentry after deportation. On appeal, Martinez and Cortez-Gomez contend the district court * erroneously denied their suppression motions because the initial traffic stop and the continued detention which resulted in the discovery and seizure of drugs were both illegal. Cortez-Gomez additionally challenges the district court’s refusal to admit into evidence at trial a purported confession by Martinez. For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. James LinkousCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Cirilo Mendoza, United States of America v. Cirilo Mendoza, Martha WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Gonzalo Pereira-MunozCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Horasio Herrera-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Gary D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Margarito Gomez Serena, Jr., Also Known as Margarito Rodriguez SerenaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Delgado-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. HettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API