Legal Opinion

United States v. Cirilo Mendoza, United States of America v. Cirilo Mendoza, Martha Wheeler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1996No. 95-3572, 95-3573PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, the government appeals from two orders entered by the district court suppressing as evidence statements made by defendant Martha Wheeler. The first order granted Wheeler’s motion to suppress evidence on the basis that her statements were involuntary, and the second order precluded the government from using Wheeler’s statement implicating co-defendant Cirilo Mendoza, on the theory that the statement was inadmissible hearsay. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. Background

On July 28, 1995, agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Claude Leander RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. James Oliver HockingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Sherman Ray MeirovitzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  4. Walter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. State v. HallumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API