Legal Opinion

State v. Hett

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2013No. 26532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jason Hett appeals his convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and for an open container violation. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained after the stop of his vehicle because the law enforcement officer had no reasonable suspicion of a violation of law to support the stop. We affirm, concluding that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion to suppress because the officer had a reasonable suspicion that Hett violated a statute requiring his vehicle to “be driven as nearly as…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Salvador Delfin-Colina, A/K/A Salvador Delfin-Colinas, Salvador Delfin-ColinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Paul Charleston GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Lance M. Freeman (98-6636), Donald W. Adams (98-6637)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Missouri v. Anthony James SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020
  3. State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API