Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Lorentowicz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 17, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is filed by complainant to restrain a suit at law instituted by defendant to oust complainant from premises 921 Broad street, Newark, and to forfeit a lease heretofore entered into between them.

Two of the questions argued by counsel in the case, as far as this court is concerned, have been disposed of by Vice-Chancellor Berry in a memorandum filed by him on the return day of the order to show cause for a preliminary injunction, i.e., the jurisdiction of this court to prevent unjust forfeiture, and adequacy of the remedy at law. The learned vice-chancellor continued the preliminary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Fleming Hotel Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. Grigg v. LandisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
  3. Thropp v. FieldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
  4. Fulton v. GreacenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882
  5. Harld Holding Co. v. LairdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Galka v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Red Oaks, Inc. v. Dorez, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API