Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Greacen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On order to show cause why injunction should not issue. Heard on bill and affidavits and answer and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The complainant claims to be the owner of a tract of land adjoining the Morris canal, in the township of Bloomfield, Essex county, on which there is a paper-mill. He is operating the mill. Part of the power he employs is supplied by water from the canal. The water is carried by a raceway across the lauds of the defendant. The object of this suit is to have the defendant restrained from diverting the water from the complainant’s mill. The defendant, by his answer, admits that he has manifested an intention to divert the water, by having measurements made with a view of putting…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Galka v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. D. Paradis Co. v. North Hudson Holding Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  3. Rockaway, C., Corp. v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Sparks v. LorentowiczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API