Legal Opinion
Harld Holding Co. v. Laird
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided March 25, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On October 7th, 1925, Harry T. Davimos entered into a lease with Margaret B. Laird for premises on Clinton avenue, Newark. The eighth clause of the lease provides that after two years from its date it may be assigned. Before the expiration of the two-year period, Davimos assigned, without Mrs. Laird's consent, the lease to Harld Holding Company.
Under the terms of the lease, $1,000 was due on January 1st, 1927. The ninth clause of the lease provides:
"It is expressly understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that if the rent above referred to or any part thereof shall be unpaid on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grigg v. LandisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
- Lask v. Bedell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- Baldwin v. Van VorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
- Ye Olde Staten Island Dyers & Cleaners v. Barrett, Nephews & Co., Old Staten Island Dyeing Establishment, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elder v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Sparks v. LorentowiczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Harld Holding Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928