Legal Opinion

Bastian v. Cedar Hills Inv. and Land Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1981No. 16941, 16954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

These cases involve a contract to purchase land for purposes of development. At issue are the existence and meaning of the contract and the measure of damages for its breach.

In No. 16941, Bastían and others, buyer, seek damages against Cedar Hills and others, seller, for non-performance. The district court gave a judgment for $35,000, which represents return of the buyer’s earnest money. On appeal, buyer urges error in the court’s failure to award damages for the difference between the market value and the contract price of the land, approximately $290,000. The seller’s appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zion's Properties, Inc. v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ferris v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hansen v. KohlerUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Johnson v. CarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Young Et Ux. v. Hansen Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. CastleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Keith Jorgensen's, Inc. v. Ogden City Mall Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. A.I. Transport v. Imperial Premium Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
  4. Tuft v. Federal LeasingUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC v. Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API