Williams v. Roberts

OPINION

CADENA, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Dr. E. H. Williams, appeals from a judgment awarding him damages in the amount of $18,235.59 against defendant, Robert F. Roberts. Plaintiff’s sole complaint is that the trial court erred in not awarding him prejudgment interest on the amount recovered. Defendant has not responded to plaintiff’s sole point of error but, instead, as cross-appellant, presents points challenging the judgment rendered against him.

Defendant hired plaintiff, a doctor of veterinary medicine, as a veterinarian and general manager of defendant’s thoroughbred racehorse ranch.…