Legal Opinion

Fratta v. Rossetti

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover a balance due for work done and materials furnished for the defendants. Verdict was ordered in favor of the female defendant and no question is raised respecting that. Reference will be made alone to the defendant who excepted. The defendant pleaded payment among other matters. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $1,010.14. It is conceded that a finding for the plaintiff was warranted by the evidence. The only point presented on the record is whether the defendant was entitled to a credit of $300 by reason of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Sullivan v. RocheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. McKinley v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ahmed's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Mitchell v. LonerganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Adams v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Hull v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Rosenberg v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API