Legal Opinion

Souch v. Howard

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2001No. 00-15814; D.C. No. 97-01157-PHX-HRHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM3

Plaintiff-Appellee Gerald Charles Souch is in the custody of the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC). The Defendants-Appellants are Dr. Bruce Kanter and Dr. Thomas Lutz, both employed by the ADOC.

Souch began to complain about lower back pain soon after his incarceration in December of 1990. He received treatment from the ADOC medical staff. Souch was repeatedly examined by various doctors, including Defendants, to determine whether his treatment was appropriate. The doctors consistently concluded that his treatment was appropriate and in keeping with acceptable community…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Binder v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Boeing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Cascade Corporation, Opinion-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Zuther v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. GalvinDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  2. Meniooh v. Humboldt CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Ogbechie v. CovarrubiasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Pantastico v. Department of Education, State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  5. Pantastico v. Department of Education, State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API