Legal Opinion

Pantastico v. Department of Education, State of Hawaii

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided August 6, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00065Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII CHARDONNAY PANTASTICO, CIVIL NO. 18-00065 JAO-WRP Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION vs. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART AND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, State DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT of Hawai‘i; et al., NAGAMINE’S MOTION FOR Defendants. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT HERMOSURA’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS1 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT NAGAMINE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API