Legal Opinion
Meniooh v. Humboldt County
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 15, 2020No. 1:20-cv-05634Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 RAHTAH MENIOOH, Case No. 20-cv-05634-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE 10 v. TO AMEND 11 HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1 12 Defendants. 13 14 Now pending before the court is Plaintiff’s conditionally filed complaint and his recently 15 granted request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (dkt. 2). As mentioned in the court’s 16 previous order granting Plaintiff IFP status (dkt. 6), the court must screen his complaint under 28 17 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) due to the granting of his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.