Legal Opinion
NAT. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS, MEBA, AFL-CIO v. Pena
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 8, 1996No. 1:94CV0574PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association, MEBA, AFL-CIO (“NATCA”) and two individual air traffic controllers, David Clinkscale and Margaret Graham, filed this suit against Federico Pena, Secretary of the Department of Transportation (“DOT”), and David Hinson, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), challenging the FAA’s decision to privatize operations at Level 1 air traffic control towers.
On June 19, 1996, defendants filed a supplemental motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- American Federation of Government Employees v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Parents League for Effective Autism Services v. Jones-KelleyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Natl Air Traffic v. Secretary Dept TransCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007