Legal Opinion
Boles v. Neet
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 24, 2007No. 05-1570PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Russell M. Boles is an Orthodox Jew serving time at the Freemont Correctional Facility in Cañón City, Colorado. He sued the warden, Gary D. Neet, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First Amendment after Warden Neet denied his request to wear certain religious garments while being transported to a hospital. Warden Neet moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, but the district court denied the motion, and he now appeals that determination. We exercise jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the Cohen 1 collateral order…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Vinning-El v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Buck v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Melvin Barhite v. Patricia CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.