Legal Opinion
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD. v. Bruggeman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 2, 2022No. 3:21-cv-08489Unknown
1Opinion
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC Case No. 21-cv-08489-MMC APPLIANCE CO., LTD., 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 6 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT v. SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.’S MOTION 7 TO DISMISS JOHN BRUGGEMAN, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6),” filed July 18, 11 2022, by defendant Signify Holding B.V. (“Signify”). Plaintiff Jiaxing Super Lighting 12 Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Super Lighting”) has filed opposition, to which Signify has 13 replied.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.