Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Central Trust Co. of Northeastern Ohio, N.A.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1992No. 90-2035PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

It is the fundamental duty of the courts to ascertain the intent of a testator in making a will, including any testamentary trust provisions contained therein, and to give effect to those intentions wherever legally feasible. Tootle v. Tootle (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 244, 247, 22 OBR 420, 423, 490 N.E.2d 878, 881; Anderson v. Gibson (1927), 116 Ohio St. 684, 157 N.E. 377, at paragraph one of the syllabus; Townsend’s Executors v. Townsend (1874), 25 Ohio St. 477, at paragraph one of the syllabus; see, also, Ohio Citizens Bank v. Mills (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 153, 155, 543 N.E.2d 1206, 1208…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Casey v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Albright v. AlbrightOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Flynn v. BredbeckOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re Trust Under Will of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Central Trust Co. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  4. Fifth Third Bank v. HarrisHamilton County Probate Court · 2003
  5. in re Estate of DeChellisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API