Legal Opinion

DeWoody v. Rippley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 2, 1997No. 2-96-164-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

I. Introduction

Appellants, Michael DeWoody and Paul DeWoody (the “DeWoodys”) individually and derivatively on behalf of Cable Advertising Networks, Inc. (“CAN”) challenge the trial court’s entry of a summary judgment in favor of appellees, the defendants in the court below. In January 1996, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the appellees finding no disputed issues of material fact and determining that the appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all of the plaintiffs’ individual and derivative claims.

Because appellees’ motion…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lee C. Ritchie v. Ann Caldwell Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Oaic Commercial Assets, L.L.C. v. Stonegate Village, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  4. Guest v. Cochran, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Hendricks v. Thornton, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API