Legal Opinion
Peckham v. Peckham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 10, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
These were cross-actions brought by the operators of motor vehicles involved in an 'intersection collision, each claiming that the other’s negligence caused the collision. The cases were tried together. A verdict for the plaintiff was returned in Knofla v. Peckham and a defendant’s verdict in the other case. Peckham has appealed from denial of his motions to set aside the verdicts and from the judgments rendered, assigning error in the charge.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: Parker Street in Manchester runs north and south and is intersected by Lydall Street, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- City of New London v. Pequot Point Beach Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Fitzhugh v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Kleps v. DworkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Weimer v. Brock-Hall Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Ingeneri v. MakrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Pickering v. THERESA RANKIN-CARLEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Clement v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.